Regarding the Manelas Device (Axil Axil)

The following post has been submitted by Axil Axil

Regarding the Manelas Device

For background see

It might be that the pulsed current of the 137 kilohertz square wave input current produces a magnetic dipole with a large instantaneous power factor because the current is produced by a square wave like the Brillouin method. The 24 volt constant current also produces heat and the strontium ferrite magnet is heat resistant. The maximum operating temperature of the magnet is 250C and the Curie temperature is 450C. The resistance to demagnetization of the ferrite magnets goes up with temperature. With that high temperature operating capacity, coherent magnetically based Surface Plasmon polaritons may form under the influence of the magnetic dipole motion that localize around the magnetic field lines as heat photons become entangled with magnetic dipoles.

If these magnetic polaritons become coherent, these polaritons may produce enough magnetic power to destabilize the bullet of the gas above the surface of the magnet inside the Mandela’s Device black box. The Mandela ballot is flat and square with a large surface area. This flat topology with a large surface area might permit a maximum of magnetic dipoles to form on the surface of the magnetic Mandela bullet. I would like to know what type of gas filled the black box…is it protium or deuterium or air?

The Manelas Device functional diagram as follows:

  • Axil Axil

    Don Watson – Mike Watson – On the successful Replications of Floyd Sweet’s VTA.

    A reason for the replication failure after a minute is a change in temperature.

    If you consider the diagram above, you will see that the quantum critical point changes with an increase or decrease in temperature. Maintaining a constant temperature might be required to keep the VTA working. In other words, the activator signal is sensitive to temperature change of the billet. The billet might have cooled due to magnetic cooling.

    I like the two magnet configuration because this position of the coils in between the two magnets might minimize coil interference with the magnetic flux lines between the two magnets.

  • Axil Axil

    Thinking about how to determine how the aforementioned magnetic bubble behaves as follows:

    The boundary of the boarder of the bubble as described in my last post should be determined through experimentation in order to understand, visualize, and maximize the operation of the output pickup coil. To do this experimentally, we must determine how the border of the bubble(BB) behaves in response to the adjustments applied quantum tuning parameter (QTP): it might expand or contract while still centered in place, it might move horizontally and/or vertically with this movement including the bubble center, and finally the boarder of the bubble might grow and decrease periodically in strength.

    In order for these aforementioned bubble movements to be visualized in Magnetic Viewing Film (MVF) as seen in the Bendini video, the frequency of the activation coil pulses would need to limited to under 10 CPS so that bubble movement can be seen with our eyes.

    As an experimental equipment requirement, a sensitive signal wave generator that can handle very low frequencies together with sub cycle fine tuning is required to drive the activation coil.

  • Axil Axil

    Getting back to the John Bendini video again:

    At 8:12 into the video, John Bendini shows how the conditioning of the magnet using a coil that wraps around the side of the magnetic billet will produce a magnetic pole structure that has one pole located in the center and another pole surrounding the center pole located on the exterior edge of the billet.

    The edge coil produces magnetic field lines which conditions the billet that pass orthogonal to the surface of the billet. After conditioning, all the magnetic boundaries are standing vertical to the surface of the billet. This orientation of the conditioning field lines direct the magnetic domains to reorient themselves to all assume the polarization of one pole directed vertically from the surface. As a reaction to edge concentration of polarity, at the center of the billet, magnetic domains of the opposite polarity will concentrate forming a centralized magnetic bubble.

    All magnetic field lines rise vertically from the surface of the billet. This is why the needle seen in page 6 of the slide show reference below points up vertically from the center of the billet.

    I beleive that this magnetic bubble is made to vibrate when a triggering magnetic field is applied to the billet. John Bendini states that the bubble moves around easily when a magnet is placed next to it. This is why the metal tappers shake during the determination of the quantum critical point seen in the Sweet video. We will look at that video in a future post.

    It can be seen in the plastic magnetic sensor viewer that the edge of the bubble is highly magnetized. The output pickup coil must utilize these magnetic field lines emanating from this bubble edge boundary to induce the output current produced by the VTA system.

    In short, the vibrating bubble must produce the output current.

  • Axil Axil


    Here is a video that shows how the Barium ferrite magnet is prepared. Starting at 4:20,there is a section of this video showing that the surface of the barium ferrite magnet is NOT conductive on its surface (2d topological insulator) but the strontium ferrite magnet is conductive. John Bendini has made a few errors here that I will get into a bit later.

  • Axil Axil


    Floyd Sweet has reported that when the Vacuum Triode Amplifier is in operation, it loses weight. The reason for this may be due to the thermodynamically based Adiabatic reaction force produced when a coherent system oscillates repeatedly through disorder. This process in the EMDrive may produce a reaction force as microwaves create and destroy coherence in the vacuum thus producing negative vacuum energy.

    The magnons inside of a ferrite magnet could mimic the virtual particles in the vacuum but be far more concentrated and forceful. As the magnons oscillate through thermodynamic coherence a negative vacuum energy state might be created inside the magnet and a resultant Adiabatic reaction force produced orthogonal to the surface of the magnet. I would dearly want to build one of these vacuum triodes to see if I could get my car to float down the street. That might be something that could turn heads.

    Here is a lecture that explains how a thermodynamically based Adiabatic reaction force is produced.

  • Axil Axil

    Barium Ferrite is wonderful stuff. First, it is both a topological insulator, and an electrical insulator which tightly locks in the atomic magnetic dipole induced magnetic domain where electron flow is non existent and does not weaken the magnetic domain through electron band filling.

    The key to all this is unpaired electrons. A quantum mechanical property called spin gives every electron a magnetic field. Electrons like to pair up is a way that negates their spin. You can think of each one as a tiny bar magnet with the usual north and south poles. Generally, electrons come in pairs. And when you pair up two electrons, their magnetic fields (sort of ) cancel each other out. The orbital containing the pair becomes magnetically the same from all directions. Electron pairing is not good for us.

    But in some systems, electrons must go unpaired, leading to interesting magnetic properties. When you put an magnetocaloric (MC) material into an external magnetic field, the dipoles associated with the unpaired electrons tend to align with the field and – importantly – the temperature of the material increases. Why does the temperature increase? The magnetic field forces the spins into a thermodynamically lower energy state, and the result of this is that thermal energy – heat – is expelled. When you take the material out of the field it cools down. Thermal energy is absorbed by the system to return the dipoles to a more disordered state. A good example of an MC material is gadolinium, which has seven unpaired electrons in its 4f orbitals, giving it an enormous magnetic moment.

    Scientists have known about the effect for decades. It was first described in 1881 by German physicist Emil Warburg, who noted that the temperature of a sample of iron increased when he put it into a magnetic field. And it wasn’t long before engineers were thinking about how it might be harnessed to create a heat pump, a device that shifts heat from one place to another against the gradient.

    Barium Ferrite does not allow electron flow to degrade these unpaired electron orbitals. Strontium ferrite is not a topological insulator but it is still as good an electrical insulator as barium ferrite. Strontium ferrite allows a limited number of electrons to flow which weakens the MC effect and the generation of magnon coherence. Strontium ferrite will do the job but not a good a job as Barium Ferrite, the job being “producing magnon coherence”.

    Both types of these ferrets can be made magnetically anisotropic. Anisotropic magnetism is a requirement for magnetic triode success. Ferrite magnets may be isotropic or anisotropic. In anisotropic qualities, during the pressing process, a magnetic field is applied. This process lines up the particles in one direction, obtaining better magnetic features. Through sintering, (thermal processing at high temperatures), pieces in their definite shape and solidity are obtained,

    Barium ferrite does not conduct electricity. It also has a characteristic known as perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA). This situation originates from the inherent magneto-crystalline anisotropy of the insulator and not the interfacial anisotropy in other situations. As a Mott insulator, it possesses strong spin orbit coupling. This characteristic produces a log jam of electrons that stops current from flowing. We don’t want any electrons to move.

    A wet pressed process where magnetic particles can move when placed in a magnetic field makes for the strongest magnets before sintering with high heat can make that magnetic ordering permanent.

  • Axil Axil

    Magnons are boson spin based quasiparticles that can form a bose condinsate at a critical point (QCP means quantum critical point). A quantum tuning parameter can be applied to force a population of magnons to oscillate between coherent and disordered states. This coherent state means magnon superconductivity,

    The quantum turning parameter (QTP) might be a small magnetic field that when applied flips the magnon state between random and coherent flow. If the QTP is set right on the boundary between the green zone and the quantum disordered zone than a large amount of spin flipping might be produced by a very small movement of the QTP. When atomic spins flip, a magnetic field is produced that can drive an electric current. A large electric current can be caused by a very small change in the QTP.

    This is how a power amplifying vacuum tube (triode) works where a small field applied to the grid can cause a large current flow between the anode and the cathode.

  • Axil Axil

    Whenever we can get the spin of an atom to move: whenever we can get a spin to lose OR gain energy, that energy can be transferred to an electron with high efficiency. There are a number of ways that atomic spin can be excited: magnetocaloric where heat energy is transferred to the spin of an atom embedded in a lattice through metal lattice phonons of that lattice or quantum mechanical vibrations that are inherent in the heisenberg uncertainty principle. The key is to amplify this naturally occurring spin movements enough to move electrons strong enough to generate usable voltages and currents. That amplification mechanism might be done by setting up a coherence boundary condition that involves a change of state between coherence and incoherence where a slight external magnetic perturbation triggers this change of state.

    Barium ferrite might be a magnetic current superconductor where magnetic currents flow inside its lattice.

    An example of this magnetic current superconductor might be a magnet that allows magnetic flux lines to pass through it or not based on an external parameter: may be temperature or an external magnetic perturbation as an example.

    See (Barium ferrite is a magnetic insulator)

    Current-induced switching in a magnetic insulator


    The spin Hall effect in heavy metals converts charge current into pure spin current, which can be injected into an adjacent ferromagnet to exert a torque. This spin–orbit torque (SOT) has been widely used to manipulate the magnetization in metallic ferromagnets. In the case of magnetic insulators (MIs), although charge currents cannot flow, spin currents can propagate, but current-induced control of the magnetization in a MI has so far remained elusive. Here we demonstrate spin-current-induced switching of a perpendicularly magnetized thulium iron garnet film driven by charge current in a Pt overlayer. We estimate a relatively large spin-mixing conductance and damping-like SOT through spin Hall magnetoresistance and harmonic Hall measurements, respectively, indicating considerable spin transparency at the Pt/MI interface. We show that spin currents injected across this interface lead to deterministic magnetization reversal at low current densities, paving the road towards ultralow-dissipation spintronic devices based on MIs.

  • Axil Axil

    Barium ferrite is a topological insulator. Unlike other types of magnets, Barium ferrite does not conduct electricity. It also has a characteristic known as perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA). This situation originates from the inherent magneto-crystalline anisotropy of the insulator and not the interfacial anisotropy in other situations. As a Mott insulator, it possesses strong spin orbit coupling. This characteristic produces a log jam of electrons that stops current from flowing.

    See for details,

    Research reveals novel quantum state in strange insulating materials
    February 9, 2017

    As a Mott insulator, Barium ferrite also has another characteristic called linear magnetoresistance (LMR). The origin of the LMR in this case is likely related to small density variations throughout the solid which cannot be avoided in conventional material growth techniques. This leads to a contribution of a linear Hall resistance caused by the Lorentz force in a magnetic field on a moving electron on the measured magnetoresistance.

    Read more at:

    The origin of linear magnetoresistance—exotic or classical?

    IMHO, the differences in the two types of magnetic materials used in the Sweet system and the Manelas system make operating quantum mechanical mechanisms of these two systems different.

    Finally, a magnetizing coil wrapped around the edge of the magnetic billet will produce a field where the edges of the billet demonstrates a south pole. This is because the field lines nearest the magnetizing coil are the strongest and a north pole bubble in the middle where the magnetic field lines are the weakest.

    A huge amount of work must be done to understand how these types of Vacuum Triode Amplifier systems work. But the prospect of understanding how the reported trust production characteristics work like what occurs in the EDDrive system might make the investment in all that work worthwhile.

    Finally, unlike LENR, the lack of subatomic particle production is also a selling feature of these systems well worth the work to understand.

  • Axil Axil

    If you have the time, this video explains how the cooling occurs:

    With the additional info provided by Brian Ahern, my best guess now is that magnetic flux produces electron movement. These changes in the magnetic field produced by the magnetic billet are induced by the magnetic flux change produced when the input current flows through the input coil.

    What I would like to know is what coils of the three coils are the input and output coils.

    The random motion of the magnetic domains in the crystal structure of the billet due to both the uncertainty principle and thermal movement of magnetic domains might be where excess magnetic flux is coming from. This input magnetic flux might induce that “magnetic noise” to increase.

    Just by flipping a few spins on the outside edge of the billet using the weak input magnetic flux might produce and avalanche of spin movement throughout the billet in many surrounding spins throughout the billet.

    The key to producing more output than input is to adjust the input to the minimum amount necessary to produce an increase in magnetic noise from the billet.

    How the three coils are layered: first applied, then second, then finally third would be nice to know.

    My guess is the the coil applied to the edge would be the input coil. The output coils are the length and width coils. The output coils would be full wave rectified.

    If magnetic amplification is coming from spin flipping, then using separate magnets might not work since the spin flipping would encounter discontinuity going from one magnet to another. The avalanche would stop at the edge of each individual magnet.

    Here is a image of how a slight disturbance in a spin wave can produce lots of magnetic flux.

    It seems to me, conditioning of the magnetic billet is a process that detects the critical transition point between random spin motion and coherent spin motion. Each billet has a unique point at which this transition occurs. No two billets are the same in this regard because the crystal imperfections in the magnetic domains are random in each particular billet. The conditioning process will locate the voltage and current levels at which this critical transition point occurs.

    After this critical point has been determined, the voltage and current is set at those exact values that were discovered during conditioning.

    Maximum magnetic flux change occurs at this critical transition point as the small input signal pushes the billet into and out of maximum magnetization. The large changes in flux that occurs through this change in magnetization state will move electrons in the output coil that surrounds the billet.

    It seems like Sweet uses a DC current in the conditioning magnetic coil to find the resonant condition critical point. Then he uses a 60 Hz AC current to impress that magnetic state onto the billet.

    Conditioning only produces a small change in the magnetization of the billet. Bringing the unmagnetized billet to maximum magnetization requires thousands of amps and volts in a high powered pulse.

    At 43:42 of this video below, a bullet is made to induce vibration in a piece of metal. Sweet did not use a high current/voltage high powered pulse to “condition” the billet. Unlike Sweet, MANELAS used trial and error methods to detect the critical transition state where the billet would gain and then lose magnetization which produced vibration in the metal.

    Sweet and MANELAS did conditioning of the magnets differently.

    MANELAS must have found the critical point on his single billet through trial and error by adjusting the pulsed current/frequency until he got to resonance. Maybe MANELAS could not get the Sweet conditioning method to work. It seems like the Sweet system is more efficient and powerful than the MANELAS system is.

    At the end of the video, Sweet impressed the critical magnetization condition on his entire two magnet configuration.

    There is a lot yet to be learned here. Any criticism of this thinking is much appreciated.

  • Axil Axil

    The backstory on the ferrite device.


  • Axil Axil

    Brian Ahern posts pn Vortex

    The Billet is 1″ x 4″ x 6″ and has four North poles at the corner and a South pole in the center. The most important physics is the 5C cooling when the deice was otputting 60 watts into the 300 pound battery pack. I do not understand how this MAGNETOCLORIC event happens.

    Axil responds:

    It sounds like magnetic refrigeration is occurring. When the square wave begins, a large increase in the surface current on the magnetic bullet will be produced. This surface current produces an increase in the strength of the magnetic field lines on the surface of the magnetic bullet as magnetic dipoles form around the magnetic field lines of the ferrite magnet. This produces a rapidly rising heat pulse. The magnetic dipoles become entangled with these new heat photons and this creation of polaritons produces a strong greatly amplified magnetic field along the existing magnetic field lines of the magnetic bullet.

    This very strong magnetic field produces nucleon decay that results in mostly mesons but with very little heat production, The mesons will eventually decay into muons then electrons but most of the muons will escape the black box.

    The collapse of the magnetic dipoles will occur after the current has stopped increasing and eventually falls at the end of the square wave. This will produce a magnetic cooling effect as the magnetic dipole coherence collapses since heat energy has been converted to magnetic energy.

    There must be a huge amount of muons produced per second to generate 60 watts of electrons. Most of the muons will escape the black box. If this speculation is true, then the lead in the lead battery nearby should generate a large amount of muon based fission.

    Also see

    Hard Ferrite Magnets

  • Axil Axil

    There is a branch of physics called “QCD in strong magnetic fields” that has conducted workshops on what a strong magnetic field can do to a nucleus.

    and also by another name “Workshop on Magnetic Fields in Hadron Physics”

    One posit of this field is that in a magnetic field of (10^12 –10^16 Tesla.), Localization of (anti-)quark orbits by magnetic field enhances chiral symmetry breaking effect of attractive interactions.


    QCD in strong magnetic fields

    Charged vector mesons can condense in a superstrong magnetic field. This superstrong magnetic field can be considered a magnetic catalyst that produces charge/parity(CP) violation thereby producing strange quarks and their mesons.

    The question then becomes, can Surface plasmon polaritons(SPP) amplify light/electron entanglement to the point where magnetism reaches very high strength, enough to produce a magnetic catalyst of mesons.

    When it comes to bose condinsation through ultra dense hydrogen (UDH) as a way to amplify SPPs through superradiance, what matters is the number of SPPs that aggregate in that condinsate.

    An analogy of the additive aggregation principle is how 8,000 AA lithium batteries can produce enough power to propel a Tesla for over 200 miles.

    Quantum mechanics can do unexpected things.

    When protons and neutrons fall apart into mesons, the final result is a boatload of electrons that are fabricated as residue from this decaying nuclear matter. This is where the current observed in the Manelas Device might comes from. A large anisotropic magnet might be strong enough to produce electrical power strong enough and properly focused enough to tear apart nuclear matter in the gas just above the surface of the magnet.

    • clovis ray

      Nice read Axil
      And having some training in magnetics and there are much to be learned about them .

      Also magnets do unexpected things as well as quantam mechantic.and it would seem we are learning that both have propertys and actions that are just now being uncovered ,and you sir are on the cuting edge.
      Keep up your good work i like the way you think.