Russian LENR Seminar Reports

Thanks to Peter Gluck on his Ego Out website we can see the list of presentations made at a recent seminar held on November 24 at the People’s Friendship University in Moscow, Russia.

Peter lists the program as follows:

Program of the day:

1. 16.00-16.10 Alexander Alexeevich Prosvirnov (VNIIAES- All Russia Scientific Researh Institute for the Atomic Electrostation) News in Cold fusion and LENR
2. 16.10-16.50 Stepan Nikolaevich Andreev (Dr. Phys-Math, Inst General Physics, Moscow), Alla Kornilova,(Dr. Lomonosov State Univ), Vladimir Alexandrovich Koshcheev (All Russia Scientific Research Institute for inorganic Materials named after Bochvar) “Non-linear quenching of radioactivity of Cs-137 in biological systems and at laser ablation in liquids”
3. 16.50-17.20 Yuri Nikolaevich Bazhutov(Dr. Phys-Math, Kurchatov Inst, Moscow) Thermal Generator based on plasma elctrolysis giving more than 200% excess energy
4. 17.20-17.50. Alexander Georgevich Parkhomov (Dr. Phys-Math, Moscow) Low Energy Nuclear reactions in nickel-hydrogen systems”
5. 17.50-18.20. Anatolii Ivanovich Klimov (Russian Academy of Science, Moscow) Plasmoidal sources of energy and the transmutations of chemical elements.
6. 18.20-18.50. Discussions of the experts

More information on Ego Out, with links to individual presentations can be found here: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-25-2016-good-lenr-info-from-russia.html

A link to the original report in Russian is here: http://lenr.seplm.ru/seminary/opublikovany-doklady-i-video-na-seminare-v-rudn-24112016

I am at a disadvantage here because these presentations were all made in Russian, but I hope we’ll be able to get some help with that from both Russian speakers and computer translations which will help us get a better idea of the content of the presentations.

  • Bob Greenyer

    Yes – I apologise, I made and errata, reactor BB3 was not Mass Flow Calorimeter based – I was reading on a bus – feeling motion sickness and just wanted to get the isotope data out.

  • Bob Greenyer

    New publication from Alexander Parkhomov sees 640 MJ of excess heat over 40 days in Mass Flow Calorimeter and “significant changes in the isotopic composition of lithium and nickel”

    Presentation was made at People’s Friendship University on 24 November 2016 where he said that the excess power was 300 watts and 180 kWh of excess heat over the 40 days run.

    https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/1349138075116888:0

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/093b7c84f6f4465189228a38986dbbc4d7692fa901bdcb876cc9d475c8536b96.png

    • https://www.facebook.com/app_scoped_user_id/100002656573372/ Ian Walker

      Hi all

      Converting 640 MJ to Kilowatt Hours = 177.8 kW h (kilowatt hours)
      http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=convert+640+MJ+to+Kilowatt+hours

      The power density is enormous. :0
      Parkhomov’s little dog-bone has at least the power of 1937 high quality AA batteries
      9.56 Watt hours per battery
      http://www.allaboutbatteries.com/Energy-tables.html

      Or about a barrel Full of Batteries
      16.08 liters
      Parkhomov’s dog-bone is about the size of 4 AA batteries.

      Consider this is the unrefined technology no wonder Big oil is terrified.

      Kind Regards walker

  • Dave Lawton

    Could be useful. Hydrogen in your pocket? New plastic for carrying and storing hydrogen.

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/11/161128131524.htm

  • sam

    “Theory that challenges Einstein’s physics could soon be put to the test”
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/11/161125084229.htm

    • Omega Z

      This just doesn’t work- E(variable)=M(variable)C(variable)^2(variable)

      Many Scientific constants at the time designated were known to vary. They were set out of necessity. Overtime, this variability becomes less known or forgotten.

    • Pekka Janhunen

      In particle physics on usually uses units where c=1 so it’s not very clear what non-constancy of c would mean. One also has to remember that in Maxwell’s theory c=1/sqrt(epsilon0*mu0) where mu0=4*pi*1e-7 in SI units so that non-constancy of c would mean non-constancy of epsilon0, which would imply non-constancy of the fine-structure constant alpha=e^2*sqrt(mu0)/(2*sqrt(epsilon0)*h). Because one can define space and time intervals in different ways, instead of speaking about non-constancy of c one should probably rather speak of potential non-constancy of the fine structure constant. Alpha is a dimensionless number and therefore its value does not depend on the system of units chosen; it is a true physical observable. Then it is a matter of definition whether the non-constancy is thought to be in c, h, epsilon0 or e.
      But thus far spectra of distant galaxies show the familiar ratios between different spectral lines which is consistent with alpha being constant across the visible universe.

  • radvar

    It seems like there would be a conflict of interest between Russian LENR and the Russian oil industry.

  • Axil Axil

    A comment on the The Andreev paper

    https://docviewer.yandex.com/?url=ya-disk-public%3A%2F%2FEbmap0TnH1DTMjesWpChaPzNGaipiW%2ByItHnSB4SPXA%3D&name=%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B5%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B5%20%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%20Cs-137_%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%20%D0%A0%D0%A3%D0%94%D0%9D%2024_11_2016.pdf&c=58387351efa1

    using laser ablation for quenching the radioactivity of Cs-137.

    This experiment lays out the cause and the mechanism that underpins LENR for all to see. LENR is a process that depends of the huge amplification of the weak force through the catalytic action of coherence. A laser can induce temporary superconductivity in the material that it irradiates and that superconductivity amplifies the weak force.

    The other factor that induces LENR is coherent spin. Laser irradiation of nanoparticles produce coherent spin and the spin of the laser based photons are reorganized by the laser light induced nanoplasmonics of the nanoparticles.

    Without nanoparticle interactions, laser light alone will not induce the LENR reaction.

    Using laser light conversion to a coherent magnetic field through the interaction of coherent laser photons and gold nanoparticles shows how the LENR reaction works.

    The LENR reaction is mediated by an greatly amplified weak force. The production of a coherent magnetic field through the use of laser light irradiating gold nanoparticles greatly strengthens the weak force.

    LENR is a consequence of the amplified strength levels of the weak force that existed at the beginning of the cosmos where it reaches grand unification strength levels. At these immense levels of strength, protons and neutrons decay into strange matter mesons.

    Andreev has replicated the experiments of A.V. Simakin.

    A.V. Simakin has also produced a full range of laser based irradiation of gold nanoparticle experiments that show accelerated weak force activity including stabilization of radioactive isotopes, fusion and fission.

    see

    https://scirate.com/search?q=au:Simakin_A+in:physics

    Fusion and fission are produced as a secondary reaction mediated by muons, a produced of weah force decay.

    • Alain Samoun

      They seem to use a YAG laser wavelength of 1064 nm.
      Axil: Do you think that the wavelength is a factor in this LENR mechanism?

      • Axil Axil

        To an extent, silver and gold best use visible light, platinum and palladium best use UV light and nickel, zirconium and titanium best use infrared light.

        But the key factor in increasing the weak force is coherence and entanglement. LENR and superconductivity are birds of the same feather.

        • Alain Samoun

          So, actually the power of the laser would be more important?

          • Axil Axil

            https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1508/1508.01332.pdf

            In Holmlid’s latest paper, the laser is weak. He has used this laser throughout his experiments.

            A Nd:YAG laser with pulse energy of < 0.2 J was used, with 5 ns pulses at 532 nm and
            normally 10 Hz repetition rate.

            • LesioQ

              That’s some serious peak laser power used there …

  • georgehants

    Wonderful to see these reports of ongoing work around the World as we wait for that first open repeatable conformation.
    Good luck to our Russian friends.

  • Gerard McEk

    It seems to me that the Russian scientists are following a much more organized route to develop LENR than in most other countries. I hope that Alexander Parkhomov has some new LENR test developments to report.

    • magicsnd1

      The published docs are pdf’s of the presentation slides. I used Google translate to have a brief look at Parkhomov’s report. It seems to be a review of work on Ni-H systems, including my Glowstick GS3 and Sonseng Jiang’s as well as AP’s own experiments. I don’t agree with his claim of COP > 1 for GS3, which unfortunately leads me to not trust the conclusions presented:

      “CONCLUSIONS

      Numerous experiments carried out at different
      laboratories in many countries confirm the selection in
      nickel

      hydrogen systems, thermal energy, repeatedly
      possible excess of heat in chemical
      processes.

      In the course of the processes occurring in the nickel

      hydrogen
      systems, there is a change of elemental and isotopic
      composition of matter. This proves that the abnormally high
      heat dissipation in these systems due to the transformations in the
      nuclear level.

      That such transformations occur at very low on
      nuclear standards, temperatures and the lack of hard
      nuclear radiation and radioactivity, indicating
      the need to look for unusual approaches to explain
      the observed effects”