Parkhomov Again Replicates Rossi Effect — The Challenge is Before the Scientific Community

In the years we have been covering topics connected with the E-Cat here, there have been numerous tests and demonstrations that have validated the underlying claim of Andrea Rossi and others: that it is possible to create a nickel-hydrogen reaction that produces more energy than is input into a reactor in significant quantities — enough to provide useful energy.

It’s a very simple concept to understand, and one that can obviously be valuable in a world where demand for energy is growing and where there are deep economic, geopolitical and environmental concerns surrounding current sources of energy.

Until recently Andrea Rossi has been the main focus of attention when it comes to demonstrating the ‘Rossi Effect’ in his E-Cat invention. We have watched and waited for every word on the E-Cat and scrutinized any testing reports that have been published — and now we wait again for the results of the current test of the 1 MW E-Cat plant to be published later this year, or even next year.

But things have suddenly changed.

The work of Alexander Parkhomov has had a major impact in the community of LENR followers (small as it is), as he has taken the Lugano E-Cat Report, and through careful analysis and skillful experimentation has apparently managed to replicate the Rossi Effect on numerous occasions.

Alexander Parkhomov has presented an important gift to the world. The report he presented yesterday in Moscow gives the most extensive evidence to date that it is relatively simple and inexpensive to replicate the Rossi Effect. His work challenges, and almost begs the scientific world to follow his lead.

If he can do something this convincing and this important — in his apartment — surely it could not be too onerous for others with experience in experimentation who have the necessary facilities, materials and equipment to try and replicate what Parkhomov has done.

I like what Roger Bird wrote here today:

I figure that this is roughly the point that Rossi was at when he sought out Focardi to ask him if he, Rossi, was crazy or not. Fortunately, Parkhomov has Rossi’s success to assure him that he is not crazy. (:->)

The challenge is now out there for all to see. It doesn’t seem that Alexander Parkhomov has kept any secrets. Given this importance of the topic, I would think this would be time where the scientific community around the world (that is hired via public funding to improve our lives) should start getting involved — even if the motivation is to save us from deception.

Regardless of what the mainstream scientific community does, I have no doubt that those of us who are convinced by all we have learned over recent years and months will continue independent efforts to replicate the findings of Alexander Parkhomov. And I am sure these independent efforts will grow.

But the heavy lifting needed to bring this topic to the attention of the wider public would be easier with major scientists and labs getting involved.

  • Omega Z

    “I really don’t see why most people wouldn’t welcome greater self sufficiency.”

    Tho I have always been a DIY’er, Society isn’t trending that way and DIY isn’t always cheaper nor necessarily even better.

    3-D printing has advantages in certain realms like specialty or custom products, prototyping & in some manufacturing processes due to the intricacy of certain products. But, most things will still be cheaper in mass production. Besides, 3-D printers may eventually become cheap, but that refill cartridge???

    A Central Government will always be needed, tho I would hope we can narrow down their interference & need in our private lives. There will always be projects & needs far beyond the ability of individuals & even Huge Corporations to deal with. It is exactly these things we need to keep Government focused on. Not what I eat or wear today.

  • Surveilz

    “We unsupported tinkerers may just hit upon something interesting…”

    Yes and that is the nature and power of ‘open’ endeavors which lead to what is referred to as ‘forks’. Here’s a hypothetical… Open science replicates –> Open source designs simpler device –> FORK: Tinkerers try to achieve results with safe ingredients (table salt, plain old niclel etc) –> RESULT: Your aunt in some old-world country can source materials and build a device to heat/power her cave with.

  • Omega Z

    Wake up. Your dreaming.
    It will provide cheaper cleaner energy. As it’s incorporated into society, it will provide marginally cheaper products. It will help lift 3rd world countries into a more modern society. Those who choose tho many wont, can supplement their food supply. It will not & can not replace it. That’s it. It’s not a magic box.

    I strongly suspect if not properly managed that this technology can create problems just as big if not more so then we have today if wasted & abused.

  • Omega Z

    I don’t think we’ll need to wait on mainstream science to figure this out. A few replications & should Rossi’s 1Mw plant prove positive, Industry will quickly step in & provide the necessary research.

    Large Entities like Siemens, GE & others around the world have their own research labs & if that’s not enough, they will expand or contract Universities to complement them. It will be a competition & they wont spend 20 years or more trying to fully understand it.

    Their 1st viable products will come to market as soon as possible. New versions will follow. To do otherwise risks being left behind…

  • Any news from MFMP about their next replication experiment?