The Nanoplasmonic theoretical interpretation of the Parkhomov experiment on 27th/28th February

The following post was submitted by Axil Axil


In the plasmonic theory of the LENR+ reaction there are two possible sources from which the LENR reaction spring: the Static Nuclear Active Environment (NAE) and the Dynamic NAE.

The Static NAE reaction is pinned on the surface of the nickel powder where the the tubercles provide a phase mask that form polariton solitons on the surface of the powder.

The Dynamic NAE are formed when plasma cools and form nano-particles, These nano-particles aggrogate together as they cool and provide the phase mask for polariton soliton formation.

There is now experimental analysis that discounts that the nickel powder has contributed any power to the LENR reaction. From a theoretical standpoint, this could be explained by the lack of proper sized particles used in the experiment and also the lack of tubercles on the surface of any nickel particle no matter its size.

This may mean that there has been no value added to the LENR reaction from Parkhomov type nickel particles: these particles are LENR inert. For Parkhomov, his LENR+ reaction is only carried by Dynamic NAE.

The dynamic NAE contribution begins to be felt when nano-particles begin to form and aggregate. It looks like this particle formation process begins within a temperture range of between 1110C to 1130C when lithium aluminum hydride is used as the secret sauce.

All the LENR power may be only coming from nano-particle lithium and/or hydrogen aggregations. Experimentally, it looks like the power produced by the dynamic NAE establishes its mode of rapid power production in a very short time frame and in a very tight temperature range as an explosive burst of power.

Axil Axil

Cross posted on Ego Out


  • Andrew Hurley

    Thank you so much for this video. Do you have the video of the presenters before McKubre?

  • GreenWin

    There is a lot going on in the area of nanoplasmonics. Published articles on the subject mention interesting optics phenomena at the nanoscale including “stopped light” — which suggests invisibility cloaking. As such it is likely this area is under close monitoring and scrutiny. But it is a growing area of research and reasonable transition goal for failed hot fusion programs.

  • Axil Axil

    I base the criterion of comparison on the production of a plasma. Both Paintelli, Energetics and Brillouin do not produce plasma. Plasma produces nano particles when it cools which are the mechanism associated with the generation of the dynamic NAE. I believe that these nano particle aggregates will provide very high COP on a consistent basis. The Static NAE will not produce high COP.

    • JeffC

      Thanks for the explanation !

  • Nicholas Cafarelli

    Those attempting to imagine what happens in reactors see for the number of atoms inside the Parkhomov Thermogenerator. The analysis is precise regarding solids and a close guess regarding gases. You will find it very interesting and mind-expanding. There is very, very little inside an AGP system and alternatives can be explored once you know the numbers of atoms.

    • Zack Iszard

      Again, that stoichiometry is important!

  • Axil Axil

    The Brillouin LENR reaction is a Paintelli type of reaction. This reaction is restricted to occur exclusively at Static Nuclear Active Environment (SNAE) sites on the surface of the bulk nickel. There is little or no production of Dynamic Nuclear Active Envirnment (DNAE) sites produced in plasma generated nano-particles as occurs in Rossi type reactions. This will limit the maximum COP that the Brillouin LENR method will generate. For Brillouin, the LENR reaction is nailed to the surface of the bulk nickel. Rough surface features on the nickel surface will produce sites where fast electrons will be constrained by Anderson Localization.

    This electron confinement mechanism will produce polariton solitons at the sites of surface micro spikes and nano cavities.