Oil Price Slide Continues

I personally find it hard to believe that recent news about fusion or LENR has anything to do with this, but the recent slide in oil prices continues, and to day the benchmark prices for crude oil have slipped below psychologically important levels.

Reuters reported this morning that:

Brent crude oil fell below $85 a barrel on Monday after Goldman Sachs slashed its price forecasts, citing abundant supply and lacklustre demand despite a pick-up in global economic growth.

In US markets, WTI crude oil is trading below $80, at around $79.50 at this moment; Goldman Sachs set $75 as a near term target price for WTI — and $70 in the second half of 2015.

This slump is serious news for nations whose economy depends in large part on revenues from oil sales, but interestingly Saudi Arabia has yet to call for a cut in production from OPEC members, even though countries like Venezuela are urging OPEC to act by cutting oil production to help bring prices back up.

Some analysts are reporting that Saudi Arabia is actually hoping that lower oil prices will affect investments in the North American oil industry. The US is now highly competitive with Saudi Arabia with prices at current levels, but shale production technology is more expensive, and at certain price points shale oil production becomes unprofitable. Saudi Arabia can produce oil profitably. See below for a chart which shows the breakeven price points for various types and places of oil production.

While there are various reasons put forward for the fluctuation of oil prices, generally speaking, I think it’s supply and demand that drives the overall direction. Supplies worldwide are up, with the US now contributing as much oil as Saudi Arabia to world markets. I believe that technological innovation in the auto industry is one factor that will continue to affect the consumption of oil. While still not ubiquitous by any means, electric and hybrid vehicles are becoming increasingly popular. We also are seeing fuel cells and natural gas being developed for transportation. Overall economic slowdown will also have an impact on the amount of oil that is consumed.

On this site we have discussed the impact that LENR could have on energy markets. I think if it is widely accepted as a commercially viable technology (we are not there yet), we could see much more pressure on the energy markets. As things stands now, there are maybe some forward-looking traders who have been paying attention to the LENR story, and could possibly be making bets based on future expectations, but I think for the most part it is still not considered an significant factor in the energy markets.

  • Christopher Calder

    I just noticed gold is down to $1,172.49 as of Oct. 31st.

  • jousterusa

    I was reading “An Impossible Invention” when the oil price slide began, and I noted that in one section Mats Lewan predicts that oil prices will “immediately” fall upon the announcement of a successful test of cold fusion. Indeed, the price slide began Oct. 8, the same day the article was published, here and on Arkiv, and has not really abated since.

  • Hi all

    As more and more in the market look for the cause of oil dropping so fast, and become aware of the LENR announcement; the price will drop to the Goldman Sachs predicted level of $70; it is inevitable.

    After that we are talking a few decades of managed decline, depending how valuable it is to switch; if oil prices keep lowering in response to the take up of LENR then that will slow the speed of LENR take up. If however oil prices remain high then LENR take up will be much faster. This is just basic economics.

    Kind Regards walker

  • Timar

    Of course I could have looked directly at the Vattenfall website:


    I’m curious of what they mean by “other types of power generation” 😉

  • Obvious

    Better load up on cheap oil now. Winter is coming, air traffic is not slowing, people are not abandoning their cars, railways and transport trucks are still moving goods, and no home/airplane/automobile/transport E-Cats are imminently going to reduce the pain at the pumps. Enjoy the cheap prices while they last.

  • Omega Z

    Apology. Didn’t intend it that way.
    Yes, There is the means of intervention. Shut down a few oil wells & change the supply/demand dynamics. 🙂

    There is actually a certain range where they can reduce supply & net more money selling less. The Saudi’s will do this as soon as they think the price could drop below $80 a barrel for an extended period of time. They’ve pegged that as their price line. They think it is a fair value. From their perspective, likely we would also.

    Alternately, They try to ramp up production once it exceeds $90 a barrel.(For 2 primary reasons) This is in self interest. They have a couple 100 billion invested through out the World. High prices tend to hurt the world economy which is bad for their portfolio. The other is they are aware when prices are to high, people look to alternatives. The Saudi’s are aware that people are creatures of habit. Therefore, people turning to alternatives make them very nervous.

  • GreenWin

    “GARTMAN: We’re Witnessing The End Of The Oil Era” CNBC, 10/27/2014

    “In discussing the “end of oil,” Gartman referenced news from Lockheed Martin earlier
    this month that the aerospace giant has made a technological
    breakthrough in developing a power source based on nuclear fusion.”

    This is the story making the rounds of commodities traders and insiders. As the Elforsk/E-Cat report is publicly available from Elforsk – it is surely a catalyst in futures trading.


    • Buck


      I like putting two factors together.

      From your cited story, they ask the question: “what is the proper price for a barrel of oil delivered in 12 months?”

      From Rossi’s statements: it will be about about a year before the customer’s pilot plant will become available for a tour and review of results.

      Assuming only positive results for Rossi, this points to the Hot-Cat beginning to impact futures one year out. From a psychological standpoint, LENR will begin to impact actual pricing very soon, relatively speaking. For oil traders, how do you accept an increase the price of oil futures when you inherently recognize that the perfect substitute is there . . .

      Good Old Supply and Demand . . . it is without mercy.

      • I guess so, but what will happen when the supply side realizes that their days are counted? What happens when the Saudis realize that today they’ll get $81, but in 5 years maybe less than $20?

        • Buck

          I believe you already have a sense of the answer.

          And, what makes you think that some of the fossil fuel producers don’t already know and have begun adjusting their long term plans?

          What do you think the more sound, reasonable leaders will do?

          • Of course, they are already doing it as we speak. And they’ve been doing it for the last couple of years. Swap dealers (GS JPM etc) are short 400k-500k contracts in WTI since 2010. I believe they are buying as much time as they can, but they know what’s coming. Thats why they’re talking about Lockheed and not the E-cat.

            • GreenWin

              It also appears the entire Ebola “scare” is a rather transparent cover for stock market sell off. Another delay tactic to cover major players unloading as much oil as possible before the price hits Gartman’s predicted $10/bbl.

              Saudi should jump into LENR now, if only to demonstrate geopolitical savvy and tell OPEC it plans to remain in the energy business.

  • Pierre

    Not sure if my question was answered, regarding is there enough nickel around to use ecats to replace oil. Would love it to be true through. Need to see the right math.

    Seems reasonable that 10 billion people would need 1 billion ecats for all their powere needs, and how many grams would these ecats need? We would need to dig it all out of the ground, transport it, etc….I mean, if I need a kilogram to power my lifetime, the. We need 10 billion kilograms, or rather 100 billion to cover several generations?

    Nickel is finite and we aren’t going into space to get it.

    Is there really 100 billion kilograms of nickel readily available on the planet?

    • Donk970

      Yearly production of nickel is on the order of a trillion grams. That’s every year. If you have ten billion e-cats using a gram a year you are talking about one percent of yearly production of nickel.

      • Fortyniner

        In any case it appears that the nickel may be only the substrate that facilitates cold fusion, and that hydrogen, lithium and possibly aluminium are the ‘fuels’ that are consumed. The 62-Ni is probably recyclable into new reactors.

        • Donk970

          If I were doing these experiments I would really really want to know these things. Will the reactor run on pure Ni62? Is there any He4, He3, H2 or H3 produced? Knowing these things will at least give a rough idea of what the major energy producing reaction is.

  • Omega Z

    It’s going to be quite a while before LENR actually effects the price of Oil, Or N-Gas or Coal for that matter. Any effects in the short term will be short lived.

    Back, to the end of 2011, beginning of 2012, I calculated off the top of my head that we may need 100 Billion E-cats. I started thinking I may have inadvertently carried X^ of Oh-crap.

    100 Billion must be incorrect & I’ve spent time convincing myself of that. Slowly thinking 50 Billion was the more likely number. However, the more I look at it, the more I think my real error was that I “Forgot” to carry the X^ of OH CRAP. 100 Billion E-cats may be to conservative.

    A likely Scenario is we will need 3000 facilities in the world each producing 1 Million E-cats per year for 50 years to transition from fossil fuels. At which time, you start replacement of those becoming defunct.

    In addition, you will likely need 10,000 other facilities to build all the extra components that will actually make them usable. These facilities don’t necessarily need built, but could be older facilities retooled for redesigned components or replacing products that no longer have a purpose.

    All the above is doable, but ultimately, the transition will be of an economical nature. You may want a new car tomorrow, but you wont actually buy one till your economically able. However, In this situation, your trade in will be of a much devalued nature. Few will want it.

    Regardless, The only real signs we’ve seen that indicates an awareness from big oil is the sell off we’ve seen in Future leased oil rights. The reserves 20 years out from even being developed. Even that will be needed but it will be at a reduced value. Thus the dumping of these rights that’s taken place.

  • Omega Z

    What’s up with Oil Prices.
    Oil is very sensitive to supply/demand once outside a window of +/- range.
    It is a Commodity or for all intents & purposes a fancy word for “Auction-able product”
    It is auctioned to the highest bidder or bidded up when supply is short & bidded down when there is a surplus.
    The Worlds largest Oil consumer, the U.S., has doubled it’s production while reducing it’s demand. Add to that, the World Economy is in a slump.
    Elon Musk’s, Tesla uses an 85Kwh-e Battery.
    In the best conversion scenarios, you’ll need about “40” 10Kw E-cats to be comparable to Tesla’s Battery power.

    Even if the technology was readily available & cheap enough for this purpose, It would require approximately 400,000,000 10Kw E-cats to replace slightly less then 1% of the existing cars in use.

    $100 plus oil isn’t gone. It’s just taking a break. Once the World economy recovers, It will come roaring back.

  • Ophelia Rump

    I got the humor.

  • GreenWin

    Many here are hoping for a splashy news blast from MSM that will suddenly introduce LENR like a big Hollywood movie premier. But that’s not going to happen. The reason is that would be far too disruptive, sending millions of “little” investors to their brokers screaming to dump oil and fission. The transition from the petrodollar/oil economy is instead being managed FAR more intelligently. In fact, it is in my opinion, damned impressive.

    Considering the geopolitical repercussions introducing a new form of energy that would make petroleum go the way of whale oil overnight – no sane management would allow it. Even if that management knew the enormous benefit to the human race. A total economic meltdown has never been the goal of new energy. The challenge has been how to introduce THE most disruptive technology in recorded history without collapsing a global market economy.

    IMO, this challenge is being met brilliantly. It is an inspiration to witness the subtle, organized, methodical introduction of LENR without causing economic panic or social collapse. This is perhaps more extraordinary than the technology itself, since it requires sophisticated, experienced managers of a primitive, unpredictable people.

    Today, after years of subterfuge, the BIG wheels of economic change quietly introduced LENR – under the banner of “fusion” – as a real, serious, inevitable market catalyst:

    “Crude to ‘go the way of whale oil” : Dennis Gartman, Editor of the Gartman Letter:
    “Fusion is going to be the great nuclear power of the next 150 years.”


    Hats off to these very clever managers.

    • Agreed. Their plan right now is to buy time to be able to execute their strategy as profitable and smoothly as possible. I do however believe it will happen quicker than they wish since traders will price the oil futures i relation to future demands directly. The really cheap oil of Saudi Arabia ($20-$30) will be all the oil we need in the future. All other resources will be worthless.

      • Fortyniner

        As some limited awareness spreads it may prove increasingly difficult for the vested energy interests to palm off their soon-to-be-stranded assets onto a decreasing pool of uninformed ‘investors’. However, potential profits for those who manage to acquire a piece of the action’ will of course balance any losses – with the notable exception of the nuclear industry.

        In that case, not only will their white elephant installations become utterly uncompetitive with cold fusion, but they will be collectively stuck with several trillion dollars worth of liabilities in the form of decommissioning costs and nuclear waste to be managed (even though CF may be able to assist in the latter).

        My guess is that we’ll soon see most of the companies and consortia involved in nuclear power hiving off their nuclear activities under new flags, and then immediately cutting all financial ties. As these orphan concerns will have only rapidly diminishing profits with which to underwrite the enormous costs of running nuclear power stations, the outcome is inevitable – within months they will declare bankruptcy, and their liabilities will become the liabilities of the taxpayers of the various host countries.

        I would hope that governments will go after the parent companies for these costs, but given the obvious and reprehensible connections between politicians and the nuclear industry (for instance in pressing ahead with ‘new nuclear’ even as the Fukushima disaster plays out) I don’t really expect this to happen.

        • It’s already done. The bulk of OilCo’s and other EnergyCo’s are owned by mutual funds. Taxpayers will take all the losses. Cos will be valued at cash, which will be nicely handled by the banks. The managers will get whatever cash they can and leave the ship when appropriate. It’s not that complicated.

    • Buck


  • Philip James

    I frankly wonder how much of this is aimed at destabilizing Russia. If I were the NSA or CIA or (name your acronym) it’s far less disruptive to punish Russia and Iran and Venezuela by asking Saudi Arabia to not bolster prices.

    Add in all the other good reasons to keep prices down (kick start the global economy) and well, there you go.

    LENR could just be part of the mental lubrication that keeps it all going in a good direction.

    • Omega Z

      Oil is a commodity. If you understand how auctions work, you can understand better how oil prices are set.

      You go to an Auction house to buy a used washer/dryer & your the only bidder, you’ll get it cheap. If there is only 1 set & 2 people wanting it, The highest bidder gets it.

      If the number of washer/dryer sets are greater then the number of people, the prices may vary by who wants what specific set. Similar to Oil being of different qualities, but the price will still be lower then the 1 set multiple buyer scenario.

      At present, you have diminished demand with ever increasing supply. Nothing more. If the Economy starts growing again, Demand will increase and prices will rise.
      Even when the general public becomes aware of LENR, Any Oil price slide will be temporary & short lived.

  • BroKeeper

    Successful oil speculators know every happening in the energy sector. They have to know who the movers and shakers are hidden behind the wizard curtain. To them LENR is no secret especially when the oil producers know of its existing threat. This is why we have seen multiple oil future dips immediately following positive E-Cat test/analyst results. Yes, oil prices will continue to rise and fall but the overall effect is a negative trend as oil’s replacement future becomes certain – not because of Middle East countries’ non-lasting affect production manipulations.

    In my opinion, Frank, the ECW is the leading LENR news source for these speculators. If ECW is not always first to post the news certainly it is a quick second. Just watch the charts next time major LENR news is announced.

    • Christopher Calder

      I know this website is dedicated to the E-Cat, but the E-Cat is not the new device most on my mind right now. I am waiting to see what happens to Solar Hydrogen Trends. I don’t see any red flags popping up about their staff or their device, but I am a fallible human being and may be missing something, or their entire staff and the two testing agencies could all be pathological liars. If they are real and the product works as the third party tests indicate, then we should be hearing more from that company long before the E-Cat is perfected at the North Carolina factory site. The specs on the Solar Hydrogen Trends reactor are spectacular, and if that device is hooked up to a van and driven around the country or hooked up to an electrical generator and produces electricity for months using only water as fuel, then we will see an oil price drop related to that mind bending new technology. I am hoping and praying that it is real, and their staff said they were working on definitive and clear proof. A ready to go product capable of powering cars and jet aircraft now with off the shelf technology sounds too good to be true, but what if it is true? Blade Runner technology in this decade? Why not? Ebola certainly seems like a science fiction plot theme as well.

      • Fortyniner

        If SHT’s oxygen transmuter is real, then even Rossi’s cold fusion devices will pale into insignificance.

        CF promises cheaper, cleaner electricity, space and water heating, but looks like a technology that will be controlled and operated by the energy corporates, largely for their own profit. The oiks will have to make do with feeling good about not wrecking the planet when they flick a light switch.

        Endless portable supplies of hydrogen on the other hand promise a clean alternative fuel that can be retrofitted to gas turbine generators, steam boilers, industrial heaters and furnaces, and (in the form of light metal hydride tanks) vast numbers of commercial and private vehicles and craft, displacing gas, petrol and kerosene overnight. Only diesels will be left out, and will have to remain in service until they are phased out to be replaced by small turbines.

        IMHO even if this tech is for real, it will be suppressed using any means available.

  • Christopher Calder

    GENERAL POINT – The Earth has survived giant asteroid strikes and ice ages that froze everything down to the equator, and nature lives on. People should remember it is not nature that is in jeopardy on this planet; it is the human race that is in danger. Humans could be snuffed out quite easily, and the USA as a viable entity could be destroyed even easier. The trees, the grass, the animals are all far more resilient than us. Oil drilling is needed for our survival right now because we need oil to grow food. Without oil we starve to death, your dogs and cats and horses included. I remember when people thought the Alaska oil pipeline was the end of the world. Drilling for oil and building pipelines is no great disaster for nature. A massive human kill-off due to poor political judgements should be a major worry for all of us, not oil exploration.

  • Daniel Maris

    I think if the test results have been downloaded over 100,000 times, then the news about the E Cat must be spreading. I think it may have a marginal effect, in contributing to a sense of unease within the industry, similar to the ongoing price reduction in solar power, coupled with much cheaper batteries promised by Elon Musk (who normally keeps his promises).

  • deleo77

    This article makes mention of the Lockheed fusion announcement. I think it’s a combination of a slow global economy, hundreds of millions of Chinese buying electric scooters versus gas powered cars, Tesla, better battery storage, natural gas, more domestic oil production, and perhaps fusion news (a lot of hot and a little bit of cold).

    My bet is that the ground-breaking announcement in the next several months will come from Blacklight Power. I think they are close and will be the first company to break through in a major way. IH is perhaps 6 months or so after that.


    • friendlyprogrammer

      That will be so awesome if Randell Mills saves the day. Many stilll think he is a scammer, but he is a Harvard educated Medical Doctor who could make millions in profit just running a normal practice.

      I like the ecat,but the energy seems to be too difficult to harness. The BLP invention could save the day even if it runs at 1/100th of its predicted abilities.

      • Fortyniner

        The multi-e-cat reactor (‘pilot plant’) is undoubtedly a tricky device to run, but stable control is probably within the capability of the computer in your mobile phone – in other words, it’s just an engineering problem and will be quickly solved then progressively refined.

        Mill’s device by contrast is a wobbling heap of potential and probably fatal problems resulting from poor design and blind (or perhaps not so blind) optimism, and unlike e-cat, has not yet even been shown to be O/U. I know where I’d put my money.

  • LilyLover

    Once you analyze the mass defect measurement-estimation methodologies, MeV calculations and the circular logic to prove a point, you’ll see nature of “Nature”‘s pontification is pointless.

    The decided number might as well have been 0.0000089243%.

    Can be proven.

  • LCD

    I don’t think this is LENR related.

    • Ophelia Rump

      We will never know. Investments are like poker.
      If LENR is having an impact, I have to believe it is a very small impact at this point, hidden inside the noise. I do agree with you though, there are enough other factors to keep most minds busy. The question is what are the big dollar minds really weighing as the most influential factors?

  • EEStorFanFibb

    Electric Vehicle drive trains are already far superior to any ICE drive train in efficiency, durability, and performance …. batteries and charging infrastructure will improve and there will be no stopping electrification.

  • EEStorFanFibb

    along the lines of this topic is this recent essay by Jeff Rubin.


    Why China’s slowdown is taking a heavy toll on Canada

    • Ophelia Rump

      Wow that was a depressing read.

  • LilyLover

    Also, I’d like to make a logical prediction about formation of monopolies amongst oilcos. Saudi’s will try to buy-out as much oil across the globe as they can. So would the top dog of M&A amongst the Oilcos. This will happen despite the falling oil prices. Why? For future-proofing the chemicals business. Then Agro-industry will come-up with synthetic solution to devalue the petrochem. Drama – drama … end result … universal recycling and “we don’t need you – old money” – way of life.

  • Ophelia Rump

    Are you really that afraid of reality?

  • GreenWin



    “Swanee – how I love ya, how I love ya

    My dear old swanee.”

    Brought to you by peeps who have Fun With Lyrics!

    • Ophelia Rump

      I am not much on swan songs, but green energy becomes a stronger bet by the day.
      Anything which reduces the strangle hold of big oil becomes a force for positive change.

  • Ophelia Rump

    So we can pencil humanity in for about 30%. Unless we speed things along ourselves. I suppose that is something.

  • pierre

    is there enough nickel in the world to power everything for the next 100 generations? or 1000 generations

    • Hi all

      In reply to pierre

      E=mc^2 do the math 😉 most people do not understand really big or really small numbers.

      Nickel is one of the most abundant elements on the planet.

      While it is the matrix in which the reaction takes place, there is yet no proof it is used as the fuel, hydrogen appears is considered by many to be the main fuel.

      The other possible element involved may be Lithium, the third most abundant element in the universe, though there is an oddity in its isotopes that may be explained by the LENR reaction, and may hint at intelligent life across the universe. 😉

      Kind Regards Walker

      • LilyLover

        Funny story: A few years ago – Caltech PhDs & JPL Scientists – I had a bet : I’ll convince them that E(1+delta) mcc.
        They laughed. Agreed.
        I won the bet.
        Although, theoretically taken for granted, no one has yet been able to experimentally prove E=xmcc with correct value of x within 200% MOE.
        Sounds like a joke?
        Good day.

        • Hi all

          Accurate enough for building atom bombs 😉

          Kind Regards walker

    • Ophelia Rump

      There are nickle iron asteroids in space miles wide. It is a fuel source which could be endless.

      About 95% of all meteorites contain iron-nickel (FeNi) metal. “Iron-nickel” means that the metal is mostly iron but it contains 4-30% nickel as well as a few tenths of a percent cobalt. Iron-nickel metal in meteorites also has high concentrations (by terrestrial standards) of rare metals like gold, platinum, and iridium.

    • LilyLover

      Nickel is regenerated per him.
      The key to everything seems to be nascencey of Hydrogen atoms and their ability to interact with metal lattice. Like induction cookers for iron pots are commercially available today while the ones for copper pots are in R&D, soon enought, in the big picture, we’ll learn to exploit hydorgen’s interaction with any other metal.
      If oil can support x generations, nickel can definitely support 100x to 1000x generations!!
      & Then again Ni is not the only metal; nor is Ni-H the only type of reactions. Mill’s Magic Hydrinos are still like the rainbows – he sees it, but cannot capture it to show you.
      The fun has just begun!

    • friendlyprogrammer

      Nickel is the fifth most common element, and certainly could last mankind 100’s of years, which should be long enough for us to learn how to split water a bit faster, which would solve the worlds energy issues FOREVER (or at least until next global war), or something else.

      Early Rossi camp predictions formulated 1 gram of nickel would equal 5 barrels of oil. That is 1/5 the weight of a Nickel 5 cent piece when they were still made with Nickel. So a Nickel in your pocket (if real nickel) is equal to 25 barrels of oil.

      (A normal American Nickel weighs 5 grams)

      • Obvious

        If it is an American “nickel”, then probably at best there is only slightly more than a gram of nickel in it. The high grade nickels are the Canadian ones, with up to 99.9% Ni, but they not made like that any more.

    • Doug Cutler

      Enough nickel for thousands of years. If we ever ran low there is plenty close by in the asteroid belt. Filmmaker James Cameron thinks the next big step in space is asteroid mining not Martian colonization. I tend to agree.

  • LilyLover

    I think, the top of the pyramid of oil and finance industries already know the seriousness of LENR. The very people who are aware of it’s truth, will discredit it. They’ll create controversial rumors, while buying one day and selling the other to fuel the speculations. Sudden one time loss is not that attractive. The up and down skimming through ‘volatility and ambiguity of behavior’ exhibited by top traders will stretch this falling prices over longest possible duration while siphoning as much money to the top as they can. That’s why the delays in domestic E-Cat will help them skim off the volatility. Although many here and other places take an educated and cautious stance of dropping oil-prices as a function of lower projected demand and not much correlation with LENR, I firmly take the stance that the Report-2 was “The Milestone” that set the oil price decline in motion. Nobody wants to know that it’s real for it allows them to justify the ‘basis of their trading’ and average population is much too happy to blindly trust their money-handlers! Hopefully someone comes up with more interesting analogy than this to explain this “elephant in the room” scenario.

    • GreenWin

      LL, please see my post on the ECW “Oil Price Slide Continues” thread. Traders are now using the word “Fusion” to replace petroleum. Pragmatic thinkers know that there is no “hot fusion” working today or for another 10-20 years.

  • Hi all

    I made the prediction two years ago, that when the Market took on board the fact of a working LENR the short term price of oil would drop to around $70 to account for a predicted maximum 30 year life span for oil as a fuel, it appears that my research was taken on board.

    I was able to make some of my research available publicly on various sites including a post in the comments on this page:

    Not surprising I suppose, that those who saw the full research made plans accordingly, though it baffled me at first until I read the Sifferkol research.

    Both I and those at Sifferkol were tracking how the big players in the Oil business and the markets were reacting to the fact of an LENR Black Swan.

    When Oil companies began selling off trillions of dollars worth of oil fields while banking the cash, it was obvious their corporate intelligence had the full facts on LENR and the E-Cat, Sifferkol found the next piece in the puzzle by following the money trail to see exactly what they were doing with the cash.

    Now according to my calculations we will have 30 years of decline in the fossil fuel market, depending how they manage the decline, surprisingly resisting the change will actually hasten the speed of LENR adoption, as anyone who studies the history of such paradigm shifts understands, hence why Saudi Arabia is already embarked on a policy of managed decline.

    This is now the twilight of the fossil fuel age and the dawn of the LENR future and time to consider where the truly great investment future is, for this new LENR Age will be more powerful than the steam age, the Automotive age, the electric age, the Internet age, and the mobile tech age combined; we cannot even begin to guess all the new wonders to come.

    Kind Regards walker

    • NT

      Thanks IAN,
      It follows that the oil kingdoms should now be heavily investing their Trillions made from oil into LENR technology and development for their own countries long term survival – that would be very good indeed for the world, if it were happening?

      • Hi all

        In reply to NT

        I think people have to understand LENR is an enabling technology, like those other Black Swan paradigm shifts I mentioned.

        One area I do know that is being heavily invested in is future space industries, some of them are looking for the next Klondike, the more sensible are looking to sell shovels to the those who do the digging. 😉

        Kind Regards walker

  • morse

    People don’t wanna hear this but we are still in an economic crisis ! People are careful when spending money even if this means less traveling.

  • PappyYokum

    In my opinion, gasoline and oil have been in the same financial bubble as real estate, stocks and bonds. The Federal Reserve recently announced it was going to end its quantitative easing. It was going to cut its bond purchases. The bubble is expected to deflate. Oil is only one of several things affected. Recession may follow.

  • mcloki

    Low cost oil also helps reduce the demand by the American Consumer for electric cars. And the Oil producers are very worried that once a consumer goes electric they will not return to gas. Every new electric vehicle on the road is 10 years of lost gas sales. It adds up for the oil companies. 3-4 dollar gas was making a lot of people consider going Dylan and switching to electric. Think of it as a way to choke out a blossoming business by stifling demand.

  • Ophelia Rump

    The fact is that there will not be anywhere near the same demand for oil in the next year because the world population will be a fraction of it’s current value.

    These are projections for the coming year for Ebola infections by month.
    The infection rate is derived from the WHO observed cases for September and October. This is not a worst case scenario, this is the current case scenario.

    8750__12K__29K__70K__169K__406K__975K__2 Mil__5 Mil__13 Million

    32 Mil__77 Mil__186 Mil__447 Mil__1 Bil__2.5 Bil__6 Billion

    To calculate the next months infections you simply multiply the previous month by 2.4
    the R0 or rate of infection. Both September and October have this rate.

    Air travel will be one of the first major impacts and they consume vast quantities of fuel.
    There is nothing planned which would do more than slow progression down for a few weeks.
    The 4 thousand planned beds will not serve the required 70% of Novembers 29 thousand new infections. Hundreds of thousands of doses of vaccine will not be enough in April when there are 2 Million new infections. Several Million doses of vaccine will not be enough December of 2015 when the number of infected has already exceeded the population of the planet.
    The actual rate of death is 70% of all infected for this current outbreak.

    • georgehants

      Ophelia, well that has made me feel better.

      • Ophelia Rump

        Sorry about that.

        • georgehants

          Ophelia, are those that survive the infection then immune from further attacks?

          • Ophelia Rump

            Yes and no. This strain has already had 400 mutations during this outbreak, which is extreme.

            You may be immune for a while, but with high mutation and large populations eventually the immunity no longer keeps up with reality.

    • PappyYokum

      On a happier note, the Jan 2016 figure can’t be correct because there will not be 6 billion people left to infect. Gulf of Mexico cruise, anyone?

      • Ophelia Rump

        Pappy, I love the name!

        It would be a long cruise with no stops.

    • Argon

      Dear Orphelia, Reality does not follow maths! You are so affected by todays US media. There is known ways this dicease can spread from human to another, and informing people about that will cut the problem to pretty much current regions. Two most important factors being:
      -Spreads only by touching body fluids, so not over the air like flu does (public places, air planes)
      -Person (even with virus) without symptoms does not spread the dicease!

      I really wonder who benefits of spreading this mass hysteria. Last case in US was more than week ago and still people keeps talking about that.

      And to original topic. I see it hard to believe any correlation between e-cat news and oil price, but more down to earth reason is supply/demand ratio. Overall news flood about fusion (hot&cold) and LENR and other alternatives, could have even passed certain tresholds causing possibly some uncertainity. We are just not quite there yet. Unfortunately second report was not convincing enough to affect any of the current investement plans.

      • Ophelia Rump

        No, sadly I am unaffected by media. I affect media. I infect media.
        The numbers are very real projections of the current reality, everything else is illusion.

        This is very much like watching a giant herd of elephants charge a speeding train. You cannot predict the outcome, but you can know that it will be spectacular and horrific.

        Half the world’s population is third world, the other half is pretentious and just as ignorant.

    • Paul Smith

      This reminds me the book “The Stand” by Stephen King. Have you read it?

      • pierre

        great book and tv mini series

      • Ophelia Rump

        Yes, he is an excellent author. I have read a few of his books.

    • bachcole

      I and many other people more qualified than me made similar projections for AIDS in the early 1980’s, and those projections simply failed miserably. I agree that the breakout of Ebola is a very dangerous development for the human race. But consider the following:

      Most of these current victims are people who simply did not understand that handling the dead bodies of Ebola victims is the best way to contract the disease, and they habitually handled the dead bodies of their loved ones as part of their grieving process. Most everyone else in the world now know this. This is akin to the fact that AIDS is contracted mostly by unprotected homosexual sex. We are getting a better handle on how Ebola is transmitted.

      The scientific modern (mostly Western) world is learning a lot of other things about the transmission of Ebola that I don’t even know about yet. They say that Ebola can be transmitted from counter surfaces. Most people in the modern world are germ-phobic, and it my opinion this germ-phobia has now become a good thing. I will be telling my wife that it is OK for her to be germ-phobic. Everyone keeps their counter surfaces sparkly clean in the modern world.

      Also, for most of us, the temperature of the counter tops is much lower than the temperature in western Africa. My counter tops are like 66 degrees F (nights non-Summer) to 81 degrees F (days Summer). In western Africa, I am sure that their counter tops are usually like 75 to 95.

      I don’t think that this and many other good reasons are any reason to lower our guard. I applaud the US states in our northeast who are quaranteening anyone coming back from western Africa, despite what the Traitor-in-Chief is saying.

      Most of the current victims were weakened by poor diet and lifestyle. Admittedly, if being overweight is a risk factor, we in the West are screwed. For me, 45 years a health nut, I will be taking lots of vitamin C, low carbs, big salads, free range eggs, rebounding, yoga, etc. etc. etc. And I won’t be losing so much as a second of sleep over the matter, particularly since poor sleep is a risk factor for poor health and death.

      • Ophelia Rump

        I had to lookup rebounding, that does look like fun.

        • bachcole

          Rebounding does amazing things for my health. One must be careful to use a very soft bounce, which costs more.

    • US_Citizen71

      Those numbers only work if no changes occur. As the infected numbers reach the millions or tens of millions, many borders will close, blockades will be enforced, martial law will get implemented in severely affected areas, totalitarian governments like N.Korea will implement harsh quarantine rules possibly including annihilation of the infected if the problem becomes severe enough in their country or in neighboring countries. As the numbers reach higher more and more moderate governments will implement the same style controls. How to handle outbreaks reaching levels you describe has been modeled and ‘war gamed’ for decades. The uninfected will sacrifice the infected in the end to save themselves. This is nothing the world hasn’t experienced before, look at how the black plague was handled in the middle-ages.

      • Ophelia Rump

        It would require significant change, and I pray for that. I have yet to see any planned which would be significant at the time of delivery.

        As I recall the whole black plague thing did not play out so well.

    • pierre

      mary you are so funny!

      • Ophelia Rump

        be nice

    • LCD

      There is no reason to scare people like this, this is a silly post.

    • mytakeis

      This really need not be: exercise, eat well and maximize you vitamin C. Then you can look at the future optimistically. Oil is coming down because the writing is on the wall, the age of free energy is a clarion call.

  • GreenWin
    • Ged

      It was an interesting read, but a bit sensational to me. The weak energy and manufacturing sector growth around the world is probably driving a lot of this lost demand for oil, too.

  • Christopher Calder

    What I find hard to believe is that people think $85 a barrel oil is cheap. If the USA had a decent energy policy and allowed drilling everywhere oil exists and it is practical to drill, the USA would not have to import any oil and costs would fall. The USA drills more efficiently than any country in the world, but misguided politics continues our energy shortage. It will take time for LENR to replace oil. In the meantime we should drill on the White House lawn if we could find oil there.

    • LilyLover

      It’s better to export fiat dollar in exchange for oil. Nowhere else, can you get something for nothing. It’s also better to maintain our oil fields operational so as to not rely upon others. It’s better to keep production running so as to devalue their demands for oil-price. We have the best strategy of extracting other people’s oil at least possible cost. They know what they are doing. Ethics? Do you think they care? Why exhaust our oil if we can keep exhausting someone else’s? The day we suck them dry and make them beg for food, we can forgive our own debts and go all out and rule them. Oil is power; let’s consume theirs’ first; then we can enjoy our surplus later. – This is a very good policy from the POV of current policy makers. It’s not misguided. It’s precisely calculated!

      • mytakeis

        I upvoted “It’s better to export fiat dollar in exchange for oil. Nowhere else, can you get something for nothing.”

    • LilyLover

      BTW stay off that lawn. I love it.
      You’ve got something against green grass? … Huh? Buddy? Huh? …Tell me … you’ve got something against my grass? Hunh?…