MFMP Progress on New Powder Cell

I chatted with Bob Greenyer at the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project just recently and he gave me an update about the work they are currently doing on their new powder cell. Below is a report and videos.
We have some really nice videos of the New powder cell and work on the sparker.These really show people what it is like to actually do this stuff and the precautions that need to be taken.

We’re going to  ramp up into “activation zone” – according to Mizuno, Celani, etc., — butwe have not decided yet how much it loaded over last night – but looks like it might have been a lot. We are following what we know of Brian Aherns approach with this and we have a dummy run with larger powder to refer back to. Going to hold at 1W for a little while longer before ramping up to 2W.

– Taking out the powder cell from the rest of its apparatus

– Swapping the micro powder (used for the dummy run) with the Quantum Sphere Inc Nano 10nm powder

– Preparing to test noise suppression circuitry on acquisition boards intended to run alongside Stoyan Sarg’s Tesla tech based HV sparker

Also – over the last few days – we have done room temperature and “below activation” temperature loading (adsorption and absorption) of the 10nm QSI powder – a stunning pressure reduction was observed. Now approaching the first critical phase of this Nano Ni powder only experiment series.

For more information and access to date files go here:

  • Mariusz

    Prof Bolotov from Ukraine says their heating element based on CF boiled water 4 times quicker then oridinary (with 99% efficiency). So measurments don’t have to be expensive and long lasting 🙂

  • deleo77

    Interesting quote from Rossi today:

    “Therefore I want to say sound and clear: we have replicated all the existing patents and know hows regarding the LENR and no one of them has manifested a real heat excess with the following exceptions: Ikegami-Petterson system and Brian Ahern System. These are the only two systems that actually gave us evidence of a heat excess. All the other systems that we have reproduced ( and we have reproduced, with huge investments, all of the systems that have been proposed in all the world in the last 10 years) have not given any heat excess evidence…”

    • Ophelia Rump

      That does not mean that the rest do not have something which works. Only that they have not documented a complete working system sufficiently to replicate. I fully believe that most do not have something which works yet. There could be a couple of hidden contenders in the crowd.

  • Hope4DBest

    Go get ’em, guys!

  • Daniel Maris

    Good luck to MFMP – nice to see them finally working with powder.

    Let’s hope they get some clearly positive results.

  • For those watching the live data I caution that if the excess power calculation rises above zero, that does **not** by itself indicate an over-unity device. The device they are testing could store up energy and then release it in bursts.

    The metric of most interest is the integral of the energy over the duration of the entire experiment (and they don’t show that). If *that* is significantly above zero then they may have triggered over-unity. I say may because you can’t rule out equipment failure or calibration problems until you get similar results repeatedly at several labs.

    So what you should be looking for are sustained periods of significant excess power that last long enough to leave the energy integral strongly positive and hopefully large enough to even rule out any chemical reaction.