Comments on: MFMP Starts New Live Test

By: dandelion

dandelion — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:19:22 +0000

Thank you, and good luck!

By: Bob Greenyer

Bob Greenyer — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:25:03 +0000

Hi Roger,

We are seeing something interesting already in this run – especially as we change the steady state, these 2L and 14L wires are not playing quite as dynamically as the 300+L wires – but that is to be expected.

Please see my post below about our internal replication process as detailed from the outset on the Quantumheat.org site. When the post analysis is done we will be very certain that the apparently successful December 2012 run was successful.

If you did not catch the SEM before images – some are here:

http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/follow-2/118-sem-wire-characterisation

Our development direction to insulated steel cells that require nearly no input power to achieve high temperatures, lend themselves to far higher signal to noise ratios.

By: Bob Greenyer

Bob Greenyer — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:16:02 +0000

Thankyou Dandelion for your thoughtful comments,

As per the original plan – we are scheduling SEM and EDX Spectroscopy for the EU wire as we did prior to the run to analyse structural and elemental particulars of the 350 layer wire that seamed to have a successful run in December.

As we are reliant on donations, goodwill of team members and their our own limited resources – we do not have the best equipment in house. Having said that we were given access to great equipment before and hope to secure access soon to do the post run analysis.

If we see interesting structural changes and elemental transmutations, we may be far more certain that we achieved LENR in that December run. That would verify that we are well on our way to making a reliable, repeatable experiment that can be shared more broadly.

In Summary: If we see more elements – we can be pretty sure we had success in December – that means we are good to refine the experiment for a wide based replication effort.

By: Roger Bird

Roger Bird — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 03:58:21 +0000

MFMP’s presentations are so dense with details that I can’t tell the answers to the following questions: Are they getting excess heat? Are they confirming, so everyone can see it, LENR?

By: Chris I

Chris I — Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:31:00 +0000

The real problem isn’t in posts such as his (interesting!) one about the Polonnaruwa meteorite. It’s more to do with those like his self-reply where he makes out that it is being hidden (by The Establishment, of course), especially when it is not really so. See my reply to that one, and you can even try googling the words “Polonnaruwa” and “meteorite” to see what comes up. One online news site had an all too sensationalistic title about it, with one of those alien body photos making it seem at first glance that a humanoid alien had fallen from the sky.

One thing is to say that researchers can and do make mistakes and some of them, occasionally, have been deliberately deceptive. One can also blame certain other parties for mismanagement and manipulation of research. These considerations do have a part in the topic. Another thing is to keep crying foul in a manner suggesting that the whole academic world is at fault, without at least singling out the really culpable parties.