Welcome to Magazine Premium

You can change this text in the options panel in the admin

There are tons of ways to configure Magazine Premium... The possibilities are endless!

Member Login
Lost your password?
Not a member yet? Sign Up!


Would You Buy a Domestic E-Cat? (New Poll)

July 16, 2012
By

Here’s a new poll for a new week. Since there has been so much discussion about the domestic E-Cats since we learned that self-refueling is not an option, (fuel cartridges will need to be installed by approved contractors), I thought it would be interesting to see how people feel about installing a domestic E-Cat in their home for the purpose of providing heat and hot water. Of course this assumes the E-Cat works as advertised and will become available for use in homes.

I have put a few different options for answers in the poll. Let me know if you think there should be another category. Also feel free to discuss your opinion on the matter in the comments below.




108 Responses to Would You Buy a Domestic E-Cat? (New Poll)

  1. Larry on September 11, 2012 at 1:14 pm

    I’m already on the list to get one of the first ones.

  2. Humberto Campos on July 18, 2012 at 1:07 pm

    Compraria um E-Cat doméstico, desde que houvesse sério monitoramento na distribuição e comercialização; e desde que o custo/benefício evidenciasse vantagem significativa de produção de energia em relação às fontes convencionais – aqui no Brasil é a fonte hídrica (hidrelétricas).
    De nada valerá essa invenção (E-Cat) se o preço da energia for igual ou superior ao preço convencional.
    Porém, mesmo que seja ótimo investimento, pelo perfil político brasileiro, acredito que seria difícil essa tecnologia aqui chegar, em face das barreiras ideológicas, das ignorâncias sem explicações, das invejas, do medo do novo…

    Humberto,
    Brasil.

  3. Stefan Flueler, Zurich on July 17, 2012 at 2:03 pm

    > “Would you buy a domestic E-Cat ?”
    It depends. If I should happen to stumble upon a
    working LENR reactor (e-cat), which is able to produce
    the claimed massive amounts of heat engergy without
    any energy input from the surrounding world, except an
    initial input of electrical energy and only sustained
    afterwards by a slow flux of hydrogen gas, I would buy
    it.

  4. Tim on July 17, 2012 at 10:45 am

    I don’t see any reason to have have one in the house (with installation, maintenance etc )

    I just want this tech to be used to produce very cheap and green electricity

  5. Stanislas Bauer on July 17, 2012 at 9:51 am

    In French, we have an expression : ” to put the plow before the oxes ! ” ( placer la charrue avant les boeufs ) to explain that the acts are done in the wrong order. Yes, Mr Rossi, we would buy an e-cat, but you must before really convince peoples that it works !

  6. GreenWin on July 17, 2012 at 3:06 am

    Frank and all, this looks to be impressive:

    “brian AhernJuly 16, 2012 2:48 PM

    Dr. Brian Ahern,

    I am announcing the nanonickel breakthrough at the New Energy Symposium in NYC on Wednesday. I am saying the energy is real, repeatable and of useful output. I will also state that it is not of nuclear origin. I will say that it is a manifestation of asymmetric magnetism. This explains the lack of radiation accompanying my 21 watts of thermal excess power. Defkalion is getting even better results and others around the world are as well.

    The energy landscape is going to change in a viral manner. “

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.fr/2012/07/some-basic-principles-of-defkalions.html?showComment=1342475299720#c2203153104555153905

Polls

How has your thinking been affected by 3rd Party E-Cat Report?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Support ECW With a Subscription

Suggested Subscription Options

Support E-Cat World by Using the Box Below for Your Amazon Shopping




Powered by WP Symposium - Social Networking for WordPress v13.02